Equity Valuation Case Lab
Integrate every concept from Lessons 4.1–4.6 into one connected analyst case. Build a forecast, calculate terminal value, evaluate payout policies, stress-test assumptions, diagnose errors, and prepare an investment memo for Northstar Systems.
- Build a multi-stage earnings and dividend forecast
- Evaluate payout policies when ROE ≠ r and when ROE = r
- Stress-test valuation under different costs of equity
- Diagnose common analyst errors and prepare an investment memo
Northstar Systems
You are an equity analyst preparing a recommendation for the investment committee. Northstar Systems currently enjoys temporary above-normal investment opportunities. Competition is expected to reduce its ROE after three years. Your job is to value the company, evaluate policy alternatives, stress-test assumptions, and produce a defensible memo.
| Assumption | Years 1–3 | Year 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| BVPS₀ | $100.00 | — |
| ROE | 15% | 10% |
| Payout ratio | 30% | 60% |
| Cost of equity (r) | 10% | 10% |
During Years 1–3, ROE (15%) exceeds the cost of equity (10%), so reinvestment creates value. From Year 4 onward, ROE equals r, so mature-stage growth continues but has zero NPV. Northstar can still grow — but that growth does not add shareholder value.
Lessons 4.1–4.6 built the toolkit: equity ownership, the DDM, the Gordon model, multi-stage growth, earnings retention (), and PVGO. Now you will apply all of them to a single company in a structured analyst workflow. This is not a collection of separate quiz questions — it is a connected case.
Calculate each year's EPS, dividend, retained earnings, and ending book value. Use and . Years unlock sequentially.
| Year | Begin BVPS | ROE | EPS | Payout | Dividend | Retained | End BVPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100.0000 | 15% | input | 30% | input | input | input |
| 2 | 110.5000 | 15% | — | 30% | — | — | — |
| 3 | 122.1025 | 15% | — | 30% | — | — | — |
Year 1
Beginning BVPS: 100.0000
Equity valuation is judgment, not arithmetic
Equity valuation is not a mechanical exercise of inserting numbers into a formula. A defensible valuation requires the analyst to determine which growth is temporary, which earnings are sustainable, whether reinvestment earns more than the cost of equity, whether terminal assumptions are economically plausible, and how sensitive the conclusion is to market-required returns.
Case mastery check
Answer all questions, then check your work. You can retry any time — mastery is based on correctness, not speed.
- 01
Northstar's ROE falls to 10% (equal to r) in Year 4. What does this imply about mature-stage reinvestment?
- 02
Why does raising early-stage payout from 30% to 60% reduce Northstar's value slightly?
- 03
Why does raising mature-stage payout from 60% to 90% leave value unchanged?
- 04
A junior analyst computes PVGO = P₀ − EPS₁/r = 113.70 − 150 = −$36.30. What is wrong?
- 05
An analyst says 'dividend yield 1% + next-year EPS growth 15% = 16% expected return.' What is wrong?
- 06
When r − g is small, what happens to valuation sensitivity?
- 1A defensible valuation requires separating temporary growth from sustainable growth.
- 2Terminal value captures all post-forecast dividends and often represents the majority of total value.
- 3Payout policy affects value only when ROE differs from the cost of equity.
- 4When ROE = r, changing payout changes dividend timing but not present value.
- 5A higher cost of equity reduces valuation without changing the company's cash generation.
- 6The simple PVGO decomposition is reliable only when the earnings baseline is sustainable.
- 7Temporary earnings growth cannot be used as a perpetual Gordon growth rate.
- 8Equity valuation is not mechanical — it requires judgment about which assumptions are plausible.